[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CB1EA6B@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:44:23 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Alexander Duyck' <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] net: refactor __netif_receive_skb_core
From: Alexander Duyck
> Sent: 10 April 2015 20:56
> On 04/10/2015 05:15 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > +another_round:
> > + ret = __netif_receive_skb_ingress(skb, pfmemalloc, orig_dev);
> > + switch (ret) {
> > + case NET_RX_SUCCESS:
> > + case NET_RX_DROP:
> > + break;
> > + case __NET_RX_ANOTHER_ROUND:
> > + goto another_round;
> > + }
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >
>
> Couldn't this just be done as a do while? It would probably be easier
> to read and there wouldn't be any need for the another_round label anymore.
Or an infinite loop with a break at the bottom, as in:
for (;;) {
switch (...) {
case again:
continue;
default:
break;
}
break;
}
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists