[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B5657A6538887040AD3A81F1008BEC63CF66F2@AVMB1.qlogic.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:03:09 +0000
From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "bind@...s.net" <bind@...s.net>,
"peter@...leysoftware.com" <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net] bnx2x: Fix busy_poll vs netpoll
> >
> > BTW, this looks quite generic - isn't it possible to take it out of
> > the driver and push it into the networking core, uniforming it in the process?
>
> Yes, this is the plan I have in mind, once net-next is opened again ;)
>
> Thanks !
>
I'm not familiar with any real strong test-suite for the busy poll, but I did try
running all kinds of netperf connections with various busy_{poll,read} values
and performance seemed reasonable, and verified that netconsole manages
to work.
So for all it's worth,
Tested-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists