[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55313D4D.4050402@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:05:17 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, jpirko@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netns: deinline net_generic()
On 04/16/2015 02:38 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 13:14 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
>> However, without BUG_ONs, function is still a bit big
>> on PREEMPT configs.
>
> Only on allyesconfig builds, that nobody use but to prove some points
> about code size.
How do you expect one to find excessively large inlines,
if not on allyesconfig build?
Only by using allyesconfig, I can measure how many calls
are there in the kernel. (grepping source is utterly unreliable
due to nested inlines and macros).
For the record: I am not using the _full_ allyesconfig,
I do disable some debugging options which clearly aren't
ever enabled on production systems. E.g. in my config:
# CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_KASAN is not set
etc.
> If you look at net_generic(), it is mostly used from code that is
> normally in 3 modules. How many people really load them ?
>
> net/tipc : 91 call sites
> net/sunrpc : 57
> fs/nfsd & fs/lockd : 183
>
> Then few remaining uses in tunnels.
Grepping is far from reliable. The above missed more than half
of all calls. I disassembed vmlinux after deinlining, there are
nearly 500 calls of net_generic().
> As we suggested, please just remove the BUG_ON().
Going to send the patch in a minute.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists