[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150420.142305.507346652058648202.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:23:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kafai@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] ipv6: Avoid deleting RTF_CACHE route from
ip6_route_del()
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:54:09 -0700
> Before patch 'Allow pmtu update on /128 via gateway route',
> RTF_CACHE route was not created for DST_HOST. It also requires changes on both
> delete code path and rt6_select() code patch.
>
> This patch fixes the delete code path to avoid deleting the RTF_CACHE
> route by 'ip -6 r del...'
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
If a cached route was created in response to say a PMTU event, and
it's a clone/copy/cow of the route we are being asked to delete,
it absolutely should be removed.
In fact this is a critically important aspect of removing routes
from the table.
So this change does not seem correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists