netdev - Re: [RFC 3/3] tc: cleanup tc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHA+R7Mzz-6j1u=6KqVgT1pesbWcon+=EZcsVU6VX7wm1zEUVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:38:04 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] tc: cleanup tc_classify

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
> On 4/21/15 10:05 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> introduce tc_classify_act() and qdisc_drop_bypass() helper functions to
>>> reduce
>>> copy-paste among different qdiscs
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think qdisc_drop_bypass() is more readable than without it,
>> maybe you need a better name, or just leave the code as it is.
>
>
> what would be a better name? I'm open to suggestions.

My reading for "qdisc_drop_bypass()" is it bypasses packet
dropping for some case, apparently doesn't match its definition.

I can't think out a better name therefore I don't think it deserves
a function, just leave as it is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html