netdev - Re: [PATCH next 1/3] ipvlan: Defer multicast / broadcast processing to a work-queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150424.002836.1182213850465198590.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:28:36 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	maheshb@...gle.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com, dcbw@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 1/3] ipvlan: Defer multicast / broadcast
 processing to a work-queue

From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:54:29 -0700

> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 14:29 -0700, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
>>
>>> +static void ipvlan_multicast_enqueue(struct ipvl_port *port,
>>> +                                  struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> +{
>>> +     if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_PAUSE))
>>> +             return;
>>
>> But what happens to this packet ? It seems leaked ?
>>
> Hmm, will take care of it in v2.

Please also provide a proper "[PATCH 0/3] " introduction posting
stating what the patch series is doing, and why.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html