lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:58:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] ARCNET: Defibrillation

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:14:41 +0200

> On 04/24/2015 08:47 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 19:20 +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
>>> Hi!
>> Hello.
>>> This patch series tries to reanimate the ARCNET hardware layer to be
>>> somehow readable and maintainable again. It includes a lot of cleanup
>>> patches. It also adds some fixes which leads the layer to become usable
>>> again. And as a special treatment it adds more features like correct
>>> loading and unloading of the com20020 card.
>> Wow.  Good for you, but why?  Does anyone still use these?
> Yes, there are parts of the industry where "old" machines are
> retrofitted with new hardware...and a lot of these machines still talk

But the real issue is, this layer is development wise in the same
category as the IDE layer.

Any non-trivial change is nothing but pure risk, especially given the
low level of test coverage the code gets.

So I really only want to see the most critical obvious bug fixes
submitted for this layer and drivers.

And no I will not accept an argument stating that you have to
restructure and clean this code up in order to fix the bugs.  That's

I'm rejecting this patch series, sorry.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists