netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tcp: add tcpi_bytes_received to tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1430262479.3711.5.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:07:59 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matt Mathis <mattmathis@...gle.com>,
	Eric Salo <salo@...gle.com>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
	Chris Rapier <rapier@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tcp: add tcpi_bytes_received to
 tcp_info

On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 15:56 -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:

> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
> 

Thanks !

> tho I slightly prefer to call tcp_rcv_nxt_update() when rcv_nxt is
> updated in TFO for consistency.

Right, but is the tp->rcv_nxt prior value even valid at this point ? :)

Anyway, this would need to make tcp_rcv_nxt_update() non static and
would convince compiler to not inline the code.

At this point, we can simply set tp->bytes_received.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html