[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B5657A6538887040AD3A81F1008BEC63D23FAC@AVMB1.qlogic.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:11:41 +0000
From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Kravkov <Dmitry.Kravkov@...gic.com>,
Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] bnx2x: really disable TPA if 'disable_tpa' option
is set
> > I agree that this fixes an incorrect logic, but its incomplete as the
> > bnx2x 'bp->flags' no longer represent the correct logic. I.e., it
> > might cause additional issues down the road, as the 'fp->mode' and 'fp-
> >disable_tpa'
> > are no longer in sync.
>
> > We already have a fix for this issue, we just haven't sent it to 'net'
> > yet. Are you willing to give us an additional day to send an
> > alternative fix? Or do you prefer to take this, and possibly later
> > we'll remove the logic added by this patch in our own?
>
> Yuval,
>
> I also have a patch that removes fp->disable_tpa by merging it into
> fp->mode (adding a 3rd mode: TPA_MODE_DISABLED). And another patch that
> removes {TPA,GRO}_ENABLE_FLAG by using dev->features everywhere.
> I'll wait and see what changes you have.
>
> Regards,
> Michal
Ours is merely a point fix that differentiate GRO_ENABLE_FLAG from
NETIF_F_GRO.
If you have a ready patch that removes the flags altogether I think
we can skip ours and review that one instead.
Thanks,
Yuval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists