netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] net/macb: Fix UDPv4 checksum offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150427.224713.291017556251723132.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 22:47:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jaeden.amero@...com
Cc:	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff.westfahl@...com,
	mihai.neagu@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net/macb: Fix UDPv4 checksum offload

From: Jaeden Amero <jaeden.amero@...com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:43:30 -0500

> If we set the checksum field in the UDP header to 0, the checksum is
> computed correctly.

I think this is completely bogus.

A UDP checksum of zero, means "checksum not computed".  And your
device isn't computing the checksum at all, but rather is leaving it
at zero.

You need to handle this properly by computing the checksum in
software and then setting the TX descriptor bits such that the
chip leaves the checksum field alone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html