[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACcJQnRi1AOYiu_0t3Acx1=t7W6z6i7DqawvWZUiCcOLV5Rm+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:49:13 -0700
From: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 3/4] rocker: Handle IFF_PROTODOWN by doing
a PHYS-DOWN on the switch port.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:38 AM, <anuradhak@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> From: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> IFF_PROTODOWN can be set by user space applications like MLAG on detecting
>> errors on a switch port. This patch provides sample switch driver changes
>> for handling IFF_PROTODOWN. Rocker PHYS disables the port in response to
>> protodown.
>>
>> Note: I understand Scott has some rocker changes on hold. I will re-spin
>> this patch once his changes are in.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>> index a87b177..e3084e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>> @@ -3838,7 +3838,8 @@ static int rocker_port_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> napi_enable(&rocker_port->napi_tx);
>> napi_enable(&rocker_port->napi_rx);
>> - rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, true);
>> + if (!(dev->flags & IFF_PROTO_DOWN))
>> + rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, true);
>> netif_start_queue(dev);
>> return 0;
>>
>> @@ -4238,6 +4239,18 @@ static int rocker_port_swdev_port_stp_update(struct net_device *dev, u8 state)
>> return rocker_port_stp_update(rocker_port, state);
>> }
>>
>> +static int rocker_port_swdev_port_phy_state_set(struct net_device *dev,
>> + bool enable)
>> +{
>> + struct rocker_port *rocker_port = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +
>> + if (enable && (dev->flags & IFF_UP) && !(dev->flags & IFF_PROTO_DOWN))
>> + rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, true);
>> + else
>> + rocker_port_set_enable(rocker_port, false);
>
> This isn't working like your expecting. PHY link is still up on the
> rocker port, so the other end of the wire still sees link UP even when
> IFF_PROTO_DOWN is set locally.
I wanted to check with you first on the rocker handling; that is the main
reason for posting this an RFC (thanks for the review).
I used rocker_port_set_enable/PORT_PHYS_ENABLE for setting the phy state
because I assumed that in the case of an offloaded switch driver it would be
the equivalent of doing "sdk port N en=1|0". Is that not the case? If not,
could you please point me in the right direction?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists