[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7NWeOLTjgAd9xQNcVP=snNOiH0aLy0FyUWzqdH+gVbJ9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:53:58 -0700
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: move qdisc ingress filtering on top of netfilter
ingress hooks
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/net/sched/Kconfig b/net/sched/Kconfig
> index 2274e72..23b57da 100644
> --- a/net/sched/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/sched/Kconfig
> @@ -312,6 +312,7 @@ config NET_SCH_PIE
> config NET_SCH_INGRESS
> tristate "Ingress Qdisc"
> depends on NET_CLS_ACT
> + select NETFILTER_INGRESS
> ---help---
> Say Y here if you want to use classifiers for incoming packets.
> If unsure, say Y.
So now it impossible to compile ingress Qdics without netfilters...
(I know you moved them into net/core/, but still they are netfilter API's.)
Why do we have to mix different layers? IOW, why not just keep TC at L2
and netfilters at L3 even just w.r.t. API?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists