netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] test_bpf: indicate whether bpf prog got jited in test suite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:41:16 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, nschichan@...ebox.fr, ast@...mgrid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] test_bpf: indicate whether bpf prog got jited
 in test suite

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:17:27 +0200

> I think this is useful to verify whether a filter could be JITed or
> not in case of bpf_prog_enable >= 1, which otherwise the test suite
> doesn't tell besides taking a good peek at the performance numbers.
> 
> Nicolas Schichan reported a bug in the ARM JIT compiler that rejected
> and waved the filter to the interpreter although it shouldn't have.
> Nevertheless, the test passes as expected, but such information is
> not visible.
> 
> It's i.e. useful for the remaining classic JITs, but also for
> implementing remaining opcodes that are not yet present in eBPF JITs
> (e.g. ARM64 waves some of them to the interpreter). This minor patch
> allows to grep through dmesg to find those accordingly, but also
> provides a total summary, i.e.: [<X>/53 JIT'ed]
> 
>   # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
>   # insmod lib/test_bpf.ko
>   # dmesg | grep "jited:0"
> 
> dmesg example on the ARM issue with JIT rejection:
> 
> [...]
> [   67.925387] test_bpf: #2 ADD_SUB_MUL_K jited:1 24 PASS
> [   67.930889] test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:0 794 PASS
> [   67.943940] test_bpf: #4 AND_OR_LSH_K jited:1 20 20 PASS
> [...]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html