netdev - Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: move qdisc ingress filtering on top of netfilter ingress hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5541F4E9.8080009@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:24:57 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: move qdisc ingress filtering on top of netfilter
 ingress hooks

On 04/30/2015 08:02 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
...
> My point is that I agree that cleanup of ingress qdisc is needed.
> I disagree with drastic measures.
> Just add your nf_hook to ingress and let's see how things evolve.
> We have rx_handler and all of ptype hooks in there. One can argue
> that rx_handler overlaps with nf_hook too ? ;)
> We cannot generalize them all under one 'hook' infra.
> nf needs to do nf_hook_state_init() and pass it around which
> no one else needs. That's the cost others should not pay.

+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html