[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55449C8D.4020902@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 11:44:45 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Olsson <robert@...julf.net>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] pktgen: introduce 'rx' mode
Hi Jesper,
On 05/02/2015 10:46 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
...
> First of all I love the idea of modifying pktgen to performance test
> the RX path.
>
> I'm not sure the simple "rx" flag is a good "name". It likely
> conflicts with other work where pktgen can receive it own packets, e.g.
> https://people.kth.se/~danieltt/pktgen/ or Ben Greer's solution.
Why do we start caring about out of tree code now? We never have,
really. If there is no interest in merging this stuff upstream,
then it's always the case that _their code_ needs to adapt iff you
want to run on a more recent kernel; the kernel dictates the uapi,
not some out of tree module. ;)
Cheers,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists