lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3200125.o3jqXuyPfG@wuerfel>
Date:	Sat, 02 May 2015 21:31:04 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stmac: add dwmac glue for NXP 18xx/43xx family

On Saturday 02 May 2015 18:40:41 Joachim Eastwood wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id stmmac_dt_ids[] = {
>         { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-gmac", .data = &rk3288_gmac_data},
>         { .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-dwmac", .data = &meson6_dwmac_data},
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-gmac", .data = &sun7i_gmac_data},
> +       { .compatible = "nxp,lpc1850-dwmac", .data = &lpc18xx_dwmac_data},
>         { .compatible = "st,stih415-dwmac", .data = &stih4xx_dwmac_data},
>         { .compatible = "st,stih416-dwmac", .data = &stih4xx_dwmac_data},
>         { .compatible = "st,stid127-dwmac", .data = &stid127_dwmac_data},
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
> 

Any chance you could turn this around and do the probing in the normal
order, with a platform driver that registers to your compatible string
and calls into a common base module?

Unfortunately, something went wrong when we first started adding platform
specific hacks to the driver. I tried to fix it up back then, and IIRC
it was agreed that it should be changed but my patches for some reason
missed out on getting merged and the mistake propagated afterwards.

It should be fairly straightforward to split the probe function
into two and export a function that takes a device and a stmmac_of_data
pointer as arguments, and declare a module_platform_driver in your
code.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ