[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B5657A6538887040AD3A81F1008BEC63D6F990@AVMB1.qlogic.org>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:58:06 +0000
From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "LinoSanfilippo@....de" <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"cascardo@...cardo.eti.br" <cascardo@...cardo.eti.br>,
"brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] bnx2x: Alloc 4k fragment for each rx ring buffer
element
A couple of not really important [ mostly style] issues -
>+ int offset;
>+ int frag_count;
u8 seems better, as we never really expect this to be negative.
[Could have claimed the same about the offset]
...
> + if (!pool->page || pool->frag_count == 0) {
Why the "== 0" and not simply "!"?
...
> + pool->frag_count -= 1;
Why not pool->frag_count-- ?
...
> + /* Page was not fully fragmented. Unmap unused space */
> + if (pool->frag_count > 0) {
Again, why not (pool->frag_count) instead?
Regardless, I'll give it a more thorough review tomorrow.
[If those are all the "problems" we'll find with it, I don't think we'll
need to re-spin this once more; that is, unless Dave insists]
Thanks,
Yuval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists