[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYYvUYygEjdHOT==W0CtMpyUbVYJxuFzNfL8mFOqHBxcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 15:18:39 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a
modern way"
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, David Miller <davem@...hat.com> wrote:
> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:06:13 +0100
>
>> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>>
>>> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:48:49 +0100
>>>
>>>> Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 that
>>>> this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until then,
>>>> you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up.
>>>>
>>>> Does that plan sound good to you ?
>>>
>>> It sounds good to me.
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Unfortunately Linus's patch didn't make it upstream. Therefore I'll ask you to
>> apply the revert, which is reminded in [1].
>
> Revert applied, thanks.
Since the required patch fixing the actual problem is now upstream,
can we revert the revert?
Caused by response time in maintainers, so a people problem, not
a technical one, sadly :/
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists