[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 16:22:33 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux@...ck-us.net
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: dsa: Add lockdep class to tx queues
to avoid lockdep splat
On 05/05/15 16:09, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> DSA stacks an Ethernet device on top of an Ethernet device. This can
> cause false positive lockdep splats for the transmit queue:
>
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 4.0.0-rc7-01838-g70621a215fc7 #386 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------
> kworker/0:0/4 is trying to acquire lock:
> (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<c040e95c>] sch_direct_xmit+0xa8/0x1fc
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-...}, at: [<c03f4208>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x4d4/0x56c
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(_xmit_ETHER#2);
> lock(_xmit_ETHER#2);
>
> To avoid this, walk the tq queues of the dsa slaves and set a lockdep
> class.
Had meant to fix that a while ago when this was bugging me, thanks for
doing this!
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists