[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554B28F4.8060301@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 16:57:24 +0800
From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <xemul@...nvz.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next] netlink: avoid namespace change while
creating socket
On 05/07/2015 07:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com> wrote:
>> Commit 23fe18669e7f ("[NETNS]: Fix race between put_net() and
>> netlink_kernel_create().") attempts to fix the following race
>> scenario:
>>
>> put_net()
>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&net->refcnt))
>> /* true */
>> __put_net(net);
>> queue_work(...);
>>
>> /*
>> * note: the net now has refcnt 0, but still in
>> * the global list of net namespaces
>> */
>>
>> == re-schedule ==
>>
>> register_pernet_subsys(&some_ops);
>> register_pernet_operations(&some_ops);
>> (*some_ops)->init(net);
>> /*
>> * we call netlink_kernel_create() here
>> * in some places
>> */
>> netlink_kernel_create();
>> sk_alloc();
>> get_net(net); /* refcnt = 1 */
>> /*
>> * now we drop the net refcount not to
>> * block the net namespace exit in the
>> * future (or this can be done on the
>> * error path)
>> */
>> put_net(sk->sk_net);
>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&...))
>> /*
>> * true. BOOOM! The net is
>> * scheduled for release twice
>> */
>>
>> In order to prevent the race from happening, the commit adopted the
>> following solution: create netlink socket inside init_net namespace
>> and then re-attach it to the desired one right after the socket is
>> created; similarly, when close the socket, move back its namespace
>> to init_net so that the socket can be destroyed in the context which
>> is same as the socket creation.
>>
>> Actually the proposal artificially makes the whole thing complex.
>> Instead there exists a simpler solution to avoid the risk of net
>> double release: if we find that the net reference counter reaches
>> zero before the reference counter will be increased in sk_alloc(),
>> we can identify that the process of the net namespace exit happening
>> in workqueue is not finished yet. At the moment, we should immediately
>> exit from sk_alloc() to avoid the risk. This is because once refcount
>> reaches zero, the net will be definetely destroyed later in workqueue
>> whatever we take its refcount or not. This solution is not only simple
>> and easily understandable, but also it can help to avoid the redundant
>> namespace change.
>>
>
> Hmm, why does the caller have to handle some race condition of the callee?
> Isn't this solvable at netns API layer?
>
> How about the following patch (PoC ONLY) ? __put_net() should be able
> to detect a pending cleanup work, shouldn't it?
>
Thanks to Cong! Your below idea is absolutely better than mine.
I have created a whole series based on the idea. Please review them.
In addition, I am not sure whether I should use your "Suggested-by" or
"Signed-off-by" tag in the first patch. But I finally selected the
"Suggested-by". If you think the tag is inappropriate, please let me know. I
will replace it with "Signed-off-by" tag in next version.
Thanks,
Ying
> diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> index 78fc04a..ded15a7 100644
> --- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
> +++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static __net_init int setup_net(struct net *net,
> struct user_namespace *user_ns)
> net->dev_base_seq = 1;
> net->user_ns = user_ns;
> idr_init(&net->netns_ids);
> + LIST_HEAD_INIT(&net->cleanup_list);
>
> list_for_each_entry(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
> error = ops_init(ops, net);
> @@ -409,12 +410,17 @@ void __put_net(struct net *net)
> {
> /* Cleanup the network namespace in process context */
> unsigned long flags;
> + bool added = false;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&cleanup_list_lock, flags);
> - list_add(&net->cleanup_list, &cleanup_list);
> + if (list_empty(&net->cleanup_list)) {
> + list_add(&net->cleanup_list, &cleanup_list);
> + added = true;
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cleanup_list_lock, flags);
>
> - queue_work(netns_wq, &net_cleanup_work);
> + if (added)
> + queue_work(netns_wq, &net_cleanup_work);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__put_net);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists