[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150507020719.GG21713@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 04:07:19 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next fragmenation icmp v2 1/2] bridge_netfilter: No ICMP
packet on IPv4 defragmentation timeout
Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com> wrote:
> Currently, on defragmentation timeout error, ICMP error message
> will be generated. This is fine when they are used in a routing context,
> but does not make sense in the context of bridging netfilter.
>
> This patch adds a bit (IPSKB_NO_FRAG_ICMP) in IPCB to control
> whether ICMP error message should be generated. br_netfiler sets
> this bit.
Why not use qp->user to make this decision for bridge too?
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> index cc1da6d..447d9ec 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ static void ip_expire(unsigned long arg)
> /* Only an end host needs to send an ICMP
> * "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message, per RFC792.
> */
> - if (qp->user == IP_DEFRAG_AF_PACKET ||
> ((qp->user >= IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_IN) &&
> (qp->user <= __IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_IN_END) ||
((qp->user >= IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_BRIDGE_IN) &&
(qp->user <= __IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_BRIDGE_IN) &&
[ This if cascade is getting silly, might make sense to add
'static bool should_send_icmp(enum ip_defrag_users users)', move if
tests there and then just
if (should_send_icmp(qp->user) && skb_rtable( ...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists