netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 05/23] rocker: support prepare-commit transaction model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 9 May 2015 20:18:24 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	sfeldma@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
	linux@...ck-us.net, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
	simon.horman@...ronome.com, joe@...ches.com,
	sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, ronen.arad@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 05/23] rocker: support prepare-commit
 transaction model

Sat, May 09, 2015 at 07:40:07PM CEST, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>
>For rocker, support prepare-commit transaction model for setting attributes
>(and for adding objects).  This requires rocker to preallocate memory
>needed for the commit up front in the prepare phase.  Since rtnl_lock is
>held between prepare-commit, store the allocated memory on a queue hanging
>off of the rocker_port.  Also, in prepare phase, do everything right up to
>calling into HW.  The same code paths are tranversed in the driver for both
>prepare and commit phases.  In some cases, any state modified in the
>prepare phase must be reverted before returning so the commit phase makes
>the same decisions.
>
>As a consequence of holding rtnl_lock in process context for all attr sets
>(and obj adds), all memory is GFP_KERNEL allocated and we don't need to
>busy spin waiting for the device to complete the command.  So the bulk of
>this patch is simplifying the memory allocations to only use GFP_KERNEL and
>to remove the nowait flag and busy spin loop.
>
>Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>---
> drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c |  393 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 271 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
>

...

>+static void *__rocker_port_alloc(struct rocker_port *rocker_port,
>+				 size_t size, gfp_t flags,
>+				 void *(*alloc)(size_t size, gfp_t flags))
>+{

you can omit alloc param here, since __rocker_port_alloc is called
always with kzalloc. Also, flags is always GFP_KERNEL, but I have no
problem in having that.

also, __rocker_port_alloc sond to me like it allocates actual port.
Maybe "__rocker_per_port_alloc" or something like that?
(same goes to other functions of similar name)

>+	struct list_head *elem = NULL;
>+
>+	/* If in transaction prepare phase, allocate the memory
>+	 * and enqueue it on a per-port list.  If in transaction
>+	 * commit phase, dequeue the memory from the per-port list
>+	 * rather than re-allocating the memory.  The idea is the
>+	 * driver code paths for prepare and commit are identical
>+	 * so the memory allocated in the prepare phase is the
>+	 * memory used in the commit phase.
>+	 */
>+
>+	switch (rocker_port->trans) {
>+	case SWITCHDEV_TRANS_PREPARE:
>+		elem = alloc(size + sizeof(*elem), flags);
>+		if (!elem)
>+			return NULL;
>+		list_add_tail(elem, &rocker_port->trans_mem);
>+		break;
>+	case SWITCHDEV_TRANS_COMMIT:
>+		BUG_ON(list_empty(&rocker_port->trans_mem));
>+		elem = rocker_port->trans_mem.next;
>+		list_del_init(elem);
>+		break;
>+	case SWITCHDEV_TRANS_NONE:
>+		elem = alloc(size + sizeof(*elem), flags);
>+		if (elem)
>+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(elem);
>+		break;

I must say I don't like propagating SWITCHDEV_TRANS_* this deep into
driver. Also I don't like storing it in rocker_port->trans. I believe
that is should be seen only by rocker_port_attr_set. Then functions with
proper params should be called inside driver.


...

> static int rocker_cmd_exec(struct rocker *rocker,
> 			   struct rocker_port *rocker_port,
> 			   rocker_cmd_cb_t prepare, void *prepare_priv,
>-			   rocker_cmd_cb_t process, void *process_priv,
>-			   bool nowait)
>+			   rocker_cmd_cb_t process, void *process_priv)
> {
> 	struct rocker_desc_info *desc_info;
> 	struct rocker_wait *wait;
> 	unsigned long flags;
> 	int err;
> 
>-	wait = rocker_wait_create(nowait ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
>+	wait = rocker_wait_create(rocker_port);
> 	if (!wait)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
>-	wait->nowait = nowait;
> 
> 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rocker->cmd_ring_lock, flags);
>+
  ^^^
> 	desc_info = rocker_desc_head_get(&rocker->cmd_ring);
> 	if (!desc_info) {
> 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rocker->cmd_ring_lock, flags);
> 		err = -EAGAIN;
> 		goto out;
> 	}
>+
  ^^^

> 	err = prepare(rocker, rocker_port, desc_info, prepare_priv);
> 	if (err) {
> 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rocker->cmd_ring_lock, flags);
> 		goto out;
> 	}
>+
  ^^^ not sure why you adding these lines.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html