[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150510175934.GA3799@salvia>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:59:34 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next] net: move qdisc ingress filtering code
where it belongs
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:45:42AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 5/10/15 9:59 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >The qdisc ingress filtering code is embedded into the core most likely because
> >at that time we had no RCU in place to define a hook. This is semantically
> >wrong as this violates the most basic rules of encapsulation.
>
> Yet another attempt to sneak in 'qdisc_ingress_hook' to kill TC ?
> Just add another hook for netfilter. Seriously. Enough of these
> politics.
Absolutely not. I will not kill TC because people like jamal likes it,
and that's more than an argument to me to keep it there.
I have to ask you to stop harassing me all over with non-technical
comments: "evil", "funny", ...
I'm getting quite enough of this, you stop that.
> Again, Daniel's patch accelerates super-critical ingress path even more.
> Care to carefully read it first?
No, Daniel is *not* benchmarking the netif_received_core() with no
filtering at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists