[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150511221536.GB9559@gospo.home.greyhouse.net>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 18:15:37 -0400
From: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rtnl: don't send rtnl msg for unregistered iface
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:53:55PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:15:00PM CEST, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com wrote:
> >Le 11/05/2015 18:04, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> >>Le 11/05/2015 17:37, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> >>[snip]
> >>>
> >>>I don't think this is the correct way to fix this.
> >>>
> >>>How ifindex can be 0 here? Ifindex is set in register_netdevice and
> >>>looking at bond_create, I don't see any call to __bond_opt_set before
> >>>that. But since it apparently is, the ordering should be changed so
> >>>register_netdevice is called first.
> >I also don't see why we would prevent to register a bonding interface directly
> >with the right mode.
> >
> >>bond_newlink => bond_changelink => __bond_opt_set
> >>and then back to bond_newlink => register_netdevice
>
> I see it now. Why not to do register first, changelink later?
> Or, change __bond_opt_set to call call_netdevice_notifiers only in case
> dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED? Looking at the other places this
This is probably an excellent approach.
> check happens, looks like a little helper like "netdev_check_registered"
> might be convenient.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists