[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431355986.566.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 07:53:06 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Dominick Grift <dac.override@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suspicious RCU usage in bridge with Linux
v4.0-9362-g1fc149933fd4
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 15:15 +0200, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:35:27PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > It _looks like_ we only retrieve vlan info to fill netlink
> > messages in timer context, so it doesn't seem we need to
> > hold br->lock here.
> >
> > But I never look into br vlan code of course.
>
> This is just a friendly reminder that this issue still exits in: 4.1.0-0.rc2.git3.1
>
> Ignore me if you are aware of the above
>
Hi Dominick
Have you tried this patch I sent last monday ?
I will submit formally when I get a test result.
Thanks
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
index 4fcaa67750fda845ad0a180332c4cd96a9524086..7caf7fae2d5b8aa369b924e1c87a47c343fb8954 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
@@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ static void br_forward_delay_timer_expired(unsigned long arg)
netif_carrier_on(br->dev);
}
br_log_state(p);
+ rcu_read_lock();
br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&br->lock);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists