[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJFZqHywcxDx1vLTtTqVfVe6hoG1M8PYH4a-7HZ9XrFJPAM-Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:25:07 +0800
From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] xfrm: optimise xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Steffen Klassert
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
> Please explain why it is unnecessary to continue with the
> loop here. In general a commit message should explain why
> this code is changed.
>
Ok, I will add
>> + break;
>
> priority is initialized with ~0U at the beginning of this function.
> What if someone has an inexact policy with priority ~0U configured?
> With your change, this policy will never match because we don't even
> try to search for it.
The original code can not handle this kind of policy whose priority is ~0U,
I will fix it when resubmit this patch.
1121 chain = &net->xfrm.policy_inexact[dir];
1122 hlist_for_each_entry(pol, chain, bydst) {
1123 err = xfrm_policy_match(pol, fl, type, family, dir);
1124 if (err) {
1125 if (err == -ESRCH)
1126 continue;
1127 else {
1128 ret = ERR_PTR(err);
1129 goto fail;
1130 }
1131 } else if (pol->priority < priority) {
1132 ret = pol;
1133 break;
1134 }
1135 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists