netdev - Re: netns: use a spin_lock to protect nsid management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55533771.6080406@6wind.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 13:37:21 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netns: use a spin_lock to protect nsid management

Le 12/05/2015 19:52, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> Hello Nicolas Dichtel,
>
> The patch 95f38411df05: "netns: use a spin_lock to protect nsid
> management" from May 7, 2015, leads to the following static checker
> warning:
>
> 	net/core/net_namespace.c:580 rtnl_net_newid()
> 	warn: inconsistent returns 'spin_lock:&nsid_lock'.
>
> net/core/net_namespace.c
>     565
>     566          spin_lock_irqsave(&nsid_lock, flags);
>     567          if (__peernet2id(net, peer) >= 0) {
>     568                  err = -EEXIST;
>     569                  goto out;
>
> I don't know if __peernet2id() unlocks on error but it can't possibly
> restore flags so this isn't right.
It's a bug. I will send a patch.

Thank you for the report.

Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html