netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3] rtnl/bond: don't send rtnl msg for unregistered iface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55533D01.6070207@6wind.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 14:01:05 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
	vfalico@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] rtnl/bond: don't send rtnl msg for unregistered
 iface

Le 12/05/2015 19:12, Andy Gospodarek a écrit :
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:17:45PM CEST, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com wrote:
[snip]
>>> First, nobody seems to care about NETDEV_CHANGEINFODATA (commit
>>> d4261e565000 says that it was put only to notify userspace). Hence, we can
>>> call directly rtmsg_ifinfo().
>>
>> Please leave this notifier here. Will be needed in very near future for
>> LAG offloading purposes.
>
> I agree with this.  It is extremely useful for a variety of reasons (not
> just the offload case), so please to do not remove it.
No problem, I will keep it.

For my knowledge, can you explain these "variety of reasons"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html