[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55535940.1040300@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:01:36 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 4/7] amd-xgbe: Move the PHY support into amd-xgbe
On 05/12/2015 05:19 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/05/15 12:22, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> The AMD XGBE device is intended to work with a specific integrated PHY
>> and that PHY is not meant to be a standalone PHY for use by other
>> devices. As such this patch removes the phylib driver and implements
>> the PHY support in the amd-xgbe driver (the majority of the logic from
>> the phylib driver is moved into the amd-xgbe driver).
>
> Did not you submit a similar patch a while ago and David asked to keep
> the PHY driver separate? Even though the internal PHY driver might not
> be reusable on another platform, having your Ethernet driver implement a
> PHY library driver seems like a potential layering issue.
I interpreted what David said was that he asked to keep it separate
because I was still using the phy_device structure and calling into the
phy library API. This patch does not use the phy library API. I believe
what I'm doing now is no different than what other NIC drivers do that
manage their PHY(s) on integrated cards (e.g. ixgbe).
Thanks,
Tom
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists