netdev - Re: qla3xxx: Odd likely incorrect use of test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 09:08:14 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@...gic.com>, linux-driver@...gic.com,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: qla3xxx: Odd likely incorrect use of test_bit in qla3xxx.c

On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 16:19 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I wrote a Smatch check to find similar bugs.

Nice.

It didn't look like something coccinelle could do and
I didn't know smatch syntax well enough (OK, I don't
know smatch syntax at all), to write something to find
these defects but I thought, if anyone, you could.

Thanks Dan for doing it.

> ath9k had memory corruption because they do:
> 	set_bit(BIT(6), &some_unsigned_long);
> Anyway, I'll send patches for the bugs I found and push the Smatch
> check.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html