| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 21:38:41 -0700 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: netlink & rhashtable status On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 12:21 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:16:28PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:13:38PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > > So it looks like we lost an skb or something.... > > > > OK that sounds reasonable. So my plan is to disable dynamic > > rehashing and then hunt down this lookup bug. > > Oh wait this isn't even a lookup failure since that should return > ECONNREFUSED. Could it be that this hang is a separate bug that's > not related to rhashtable? > > If that was the case then we simply need to get rid of dynamic > rehashing. Well, /proc/net/netlink consistently show same socket twice when I get a hang : At this moment I have more than one process blocked : lpaa23:~# ps aux|grep addrinfo root 10597 0.0 0.0 3696 376 pts/0 S 21:20 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh root 10601 0.0 0.0 1172 4 pts/0 S 21:20 0:00 ./getaddrinfo 500 root 11449 0.0 0.0 3700 384 pts/0 S 21:17 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh root 11454 0.0 0.0 1172 4 pts/0 S 21:17 0:00 ./getaddrinfo 500 root 21424 0.0 0.0 3696 376 pts/0 S+ 21:30 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh root 21425 0.0 0.0 3696 376 pts/0 S+ 21:30 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh root 21426 0.0 0.0 3744 2236 pts/0 S+ 21:30 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh root 21470 0.0 0.0 3704 384 pts/0 S+ 21:30 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh root 21476 0.0 0.0 1172 4 pts/0 S+ 21:30 0:00 ./getaddrinfo 500 root 22241 0.0 0.0 2604 1280 pts/1 S+ 21:36 0:00 grep addrinfo root 37231 0.0 0.0 3696 376 pts/0 S 21:19 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh root 37235 0.0 0.0 1172 4 pts/0 S 21:19 0:00 ./getaddrinfo 500 root 48499 0.0 0.0 3696 2804 pts/0 S+ 21:28 0:00 /bin/bash ./getaddrinfo_many.sh And only one of the socket is listed twice (ffff881f6eceb000) Apparently this is the one _after_ kernel socket. Does it ring a bell ? lpaa23:~# cat /proc/net/netlink sk Eth Pid Groups Rmem Wmem Dump Locks Drops Inode ffff881f6eceb000 0 11454 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 61386380 ffff881fe08aa400 0 10601 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 69235237 ffff881fd3c80c00 0 37235 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 65612209 ffff881fd5356400 0 21476 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 116743320 ffff881fe1d98400 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 3 ffff881f6eceb000 0 11454 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 61386380 << double >> ffff881fe1066400 8 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 13355 ffff881fe1066400 8 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 13355 ffff883fe1204800 9 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 2056 ffff883fe1204800 9 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 2056 ffff883feecf6400 10 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 9602 ffff883fe1208000 11 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 2051 ffff883fe1208000 11 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 2051 ffff881fe0f4ac00 16 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 2054 ffff881fe0f4ac00 16 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 2054 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists