[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150514062614.GA6320@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:26:14 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
tgraf@...g.ch, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net PATCH] ip_vti/ip6_vti: Clear skb->mark when resetting
skb->dev in receive path
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:14:39PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
> The fact is I am not all that familiar with the vti code and just
> started crawling through it a few days ago, but it seems like it is
> overwriting the skb->mark value with the i_key to determine which
> policy to use. The code prior to commit df3893c176e9 ("vti: Update
> the ipv4 side to use it's own receive hook.") was saving the old
> skb->mark, overwriting it, and then restoring it after a call to
> xfrm4_policy_check. After that commit it was letting
> skb_scrub_packet in vti_rcv_cb clear the mark and it was just
> dropped.
Steffen, why is vti touching skb->mark at all? This is supposed
to be a field used by user-space to control a packet as it moves
inside the kernel. Seconding it for other purposes looks very
wrong.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists