netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: syncookies: extend validity range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 May 2015 22:33:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de, ncardwell@...gle.com,
	ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: syncookies: extend validity range

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:26:56 -0700

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Now we allow storing more request socks per listener, we might
> hit syncookie mode less often and hit following bug in our stack :
> 
> When we send a burst of syncookies, then exit this mode,
> tcp_synq_no_recent_overflow() can return false if the ACK packets coming
> from clients are coming three seconds after the end of syncookie
> episode.
> 
> This is a way too strong requirement and conflicts with rest of
> syncookie code which allows ACK to be aged up to 2 minutes.
> 
> Perfectly valid ACK packets are dropped just because clients might be
> in a crowded wifi environment or on another planet.
> 
> So let's fix this, and also change tcp_synq_overflow() to not
> dirty a cache line for every syncookie we send, as we are under attack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html