| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <D17CC7D6.1AFD3%suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 15:12:05 +0000
From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>,
"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
"al.stone@...aro.org" <al.stone@...aro.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Murali Karicheri" <m-karicheri2@...com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [V4 PATCH 3/6] pci: Generic function for setting up PCI device
DMA coherency
Hi Rafael,
On 5/15/15, 18:59, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>On Friday, May 15, 2015 04:23:11 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> This patch refactors of_pci_dma_configure() into a more generic
>> pci_dma_configure(), which can be reused by non-OF code.
>> Then, it adds support for setting up PCI device DMA coherency from
>> ACPI _CCA object that should normally be specified in the DSDT node
>> of its PCI host bridge..
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
>> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
>> CC: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/of_pci.c | 20 --------------------
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> include/linux/of_pci.h | 3 ---
>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci.c b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
>> index 5751dc5..b66ee4e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/of_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
>> @@ -117,26 +117,6 @@ int of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_get_pci_domain_nr);
>>
>> -/**
>> - * of_pci_dma_configure - Setup DMA configuration
>> - * @dev: ptr to pci_dev struct of the PCI device
>> - *
>> - * Function to update PCI devices's DMA configuration using the same
>> - * info from the OF node of host bridge's parent (if any).
>> - */
>> -void of_pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
>> -{
>> - struct device *dev = &pci_dev->dev;
>> - struct device *bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(pci_dev);
>> -
>> - if (!bridge->parent)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - of_dma_configure(dev, bridge->parent->of_node);
>> - pci_put_host_bridge_device(bridge);
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_dma_configure);
>> -
>> #if defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS)
>> /**
>> * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources - Parse PCI host bridge resources
>>from DT
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index 6675a7a..3c6f2e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -6,12 +6,14 @@
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> -#include <linux/of_pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include <linux/property.h>
>> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
>> #include "pci.h"
>>
>> @@ -1508,6 +1510,35 @@ static void pci_init_capabilities(struct pci_dev
>>*dev)
>> pci_enable_acs(dev);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * pci_dma_configure - Setup DMA configuration
>> + * @pci_dev: ptr to pci_dev struct of the PCI device
>> + *
>> + * Function to update PCI devices's DMA configuration using the same
>> + * info from the OF node or ACPI node of host bridge's parent (if any).
>> + */
>> +static void pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pci_dev->dev;
>> + struct device *bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(pci_dev);
>> + struct device *host = bridge->parent;
>> + struct acpi_device *adev;
>> +
>> + if (!host)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (acpi_disabled) {
>> + of_dma_configure(dev, host->of_node);
>
>I'd rather do
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && host->of_node) {
> of_dma_configure(dev, host->of_node);
> } else {
> struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(host);
>
> if (adev && acpi_dma_is_supported(adev)) {
Ok, I¹ll update this.
>
>> + } else if (has_acpi_companion(host)) {
>> + adev = acpi_node(host->fwnode);
>> + if (acpi_dma_is_supported(adev))
>> + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, NULL,
>> + acpi_dma_is_coherent(adev));
>> + }
>> +
>> + pci_put_host_bridge_device(bridge);
>> +}
>> +
>> void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> @@ -1521,7 +1552,7 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct
>>pci_bus *bus)
>> dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dma_mask;
>> dev->dev.dma_parms = &dev->dma_parms;
>> dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0xffffffffull;
>> - of_pci_dma_configure(dev);
>> + pci_dma_configure(dev);
>
>Also I'm not quite sure if that's actually OK.
>
>We should be handling the DMA setup on x86 in the ACPI case already
>without it.
>Or is this a NOP on x86?
You are correct. x86 doesn¹t implement the arch_setup_dma_ops().
Therefore, this is a NOP on x86.
Thanks,
Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists