[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150516.172214.820543928532454603.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 17:22:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, maheshb@...gle.com, jbenc@...hat.com,
hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ipv6: make inet6addr_chain blocking and always
call with rtnl locked
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:56:18 +0300
> Unlike to inetaddr_chain inet6addr_chain is atomic and called from bh
> context without rtnl when ipv6 receives router advertisement packet.
>
> Several drivers don't know about that: ipvlan thinks that it has rtnl
> here, ocrdma locks mutex inside callback. Probably there is more.
>
> This patch makes it blocking and calls from first stage of DAD work.
> Looks like this is completely safe and rtnl already locked here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
I don't see how you can make the inet6addr_chain blocking when it is
invoked from software interrupt context.
You also cannot try to defer these operations to a workqueue or
similar to get into a blockable context, because various ipv6
testsuites depend upon the addressing state change happening
when we process the packet that triggers that change.
Instead, I think you have to make the users of inet6addr_chain
aware of the context in which they execute.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists