[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431910796.621.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 17:59:56 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Mirja Kühlewind
<mirja.kuehlewind@....ee.ethz.ch>,
Brian Trammell <trammell@....ee.ethz.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Dave That <dave.taht@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: add rfc3168, section 6.1.1.1. fallback
On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 22:11 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index 7386d32..b05d6df 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,16 @@ static void tcp_ecn_send_syn(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> }
>
> +static void tcp_ecn_clear_syn(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> +
> + if (sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_ecn_fallback) {
> + TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags &= ~(TCPHDR_ECE | TCPHDR_CWR);
> + tp->ecn_flags = 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
Hi Daniel
If first SYNACK ECE was delayed (our SYN rtx was spurious), maybe we can
still keep ECN enabled ?
So maybe do not clear tp->ecn_flags here, as it should be ultimately
cleared in tcp_ecn_rcv_synack().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists