netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] neigh cleanups and fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55595CD0.9060403@windriver.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2015 11:30:24 +0800
From:	Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <alexei@...estorage.com>,
	<joern@...estorage.com>, <ja@....bg>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] neigh cleanups and fixes

On 05/15/2015 08:14 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> atomic_read() by definition are unsafe.

Can you please recommend which atomic interface can be safely used to check
whether neigh refcnt is zero in the first patch?

Thanks,
Ying

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html