[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcc5Pg5AqFtynB_twW3ycyH+GXtMr8XLUTWGAoHhNFqXrE6+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 12:25:12 +0300
From: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Tal Alon <talal@...lanox.com>,
Achiad Shochat <achiad@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 00/12] net/mlx5: ConnectX-4 100G Ethernet driver
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
> Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 16:02:11 +0300
>
>> We didn't get a response yet regarding your comment about the irq
>> renaming [3].
>
> Well then, please hold off on resubmissions of this series until you
> do get a response and that issue is firmly resolved.
Hi,
I don't mean to push you, I only want to understand what is expected
from me and what are the next steps:
How will the issue be resolved? Do you plan to answer my question [1]
from last week, and just too busy right now or something like that?
Will sending the patchset with the irq renaming removed, make things
easier? It means that at first the irq names in /proc/interrupts won't
have the interface name in it. We can fix it later on after resolving
the problem with the current approach of irq naming. Is this
acceptable by you?
[1] - http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg328556.html
Thanks,
Amir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists