[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4985EFDD773FCB459EF7915D2A3621ADBDA809@nice.asicdesigners.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 16:49:03 +0000
From: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@...lsio.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@...lsio.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/3] cxgb4: Add support for loopback between VI
of same port
| From: David Miller [davem@...emloft.net]
| Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 12:30 PM
|
| The prevailing assumption is that it's OK to have configuration
| settings that can't be undone.
|
| And that's bogus from the beginning.
Oh I definitely understand that and agree. Unfortunately I've
inherited a driver architecture that makes that ... "difficult"
for many operations ... And I have an internal bug filed
against me to fix those particular issues.
However, that doesn't answer at least one of my questions
which was how do I pass information into the driver _before_
it does the device probe? In this case, telling it to _not_
attempt to attached to the chip firmware in order to debug,
load firmware, etc.?
And, I still need to know what mechanism we need to use
to tell the driver to use one kind of transmit functionality
or another. [[And in this case, we _can_ switch back and
forth at will.]]
Casey--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists