lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1432334575-16959-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 May 2015 15:42:55 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] x86: bpf_jit: fix compilation of large bpf programs

x86 has variable length encoding. x86 JIT compiler is trying
to pick the shortest encoding for given bpf instruction.
While doing so the jump targets are changing, so JIT is doing
multiple passes over the program. Typical program needs 3 passes.
Some very short programs converge with 2 passes. Large programs
may need 4 or 5. But specially crafted bpf programs may hit the
pass limit and if the program converges on the last iteration
the JIT compiler will be producing an image full of 'int 3' insns.
Fix this corner case by doing final iteration over bpf program.

Fixes: 0a14842f5a3c ("net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64")
Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
---
Daniel wrote the 'Edge hopping nuthouse' test case with 4k jump
instructions that managed to trigger this bug.
The test case is nuts and the bug is real.
It's an old bug, but I think worth backporting all the way.
Though this fix will apply cleanly only till commit:
f3c2af7ba17a ("net: filter: x86: split bpf_jit_compile()")
The older kernels should be similar. They have
'for (pass = 0; pass < 10; pass++) {' at the line 153 or so.
and all have similar problem as far as I can see.

 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 99f76103c6b7..ddeff4844a10 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -966,7 +966,12 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 	ctx.cleanup_addr = proglen;
 
-	for (pass = 0; pass < 10; pass++) {
+	/* JITed image shrinks with every pass and the loop iterates
+	 * until the image stops shrinking. Very large bpf programs
+	 * may converge on the last pass. In such case do one more
+	 * pass to emit the final image
+	 */
+	for (pass = 0; pass < 10 || image; pass++) {
 		proglen = do_jit(prog, addrs, image, oldproglen, &ctx);
 		if (proglen <= 0) {
 			image = NULL;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ