[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5562FFB0.40708@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 12:55:44 +0200
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, tgraf@...g.ch, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] netns: ease netlink use with a lot of
netns
Am 25.05.2015 um 09:45 schrieb Nicolas Dichtel:
> Le 22/05/2015 22:50, Alexander Holler a écrit :
>> First I think if NETLINK_LISTEN_ALL_NSID is enabled, a dump
>> of the interfaces through RTM_GETLINK together with NLM_F_DUMP and
>> NLM_F_REQUEST should return all interfaces of all reachable namespaces.
> This option is only for 'listening', ie spontaneous notifications from the
> kernel. It does nothing for request.
The problem is that you need informations about the affected interfaces.
E.g. if you receive an NEWADDR or NEWROUTE for some interface (indicated
by the index of the interface) in a(nother) namespace, how do you get
informations about that interface, if not by a dump which includes the
interfaces of these namespaces too? Without knowledge about the
interface, these messages are not very usable. ;)
> Not sure to follow you. veth0 sits in the current netns (let's say
> init_net)
> and veth1 in netns1.
> So, when you dump veth0 in init_net, its link-netnsid is set to the id of
> netns1 in init_net. And when you dump veth1 in netns1, it's link-netnsid
> is set
> to the id of init_net in netns1.
I've misunderstood the meaning of IFLA_LINK_NETNSID. I thought it
indicates the namespace an interface lives in, but it indicates the
namespace it is linked too.
I've also thought that the NETNSID is a global unique identifier of a
namespace, which seems to be wrong too. While I still not have read
through all the sources, the other comments are suggesting that the NSID
is just an ID which is unique only in one namespace, or in other words,
every namespace has its own set of nsids. I'm not sure if I'm now right
with that assumption, but that's what I now think after the responses to
my mail. ;)
So to conclude, I've now scheduled support for namespaces to a far later
point. It doesn't seem to be as easy as I've thought after having read
the introductory mail of your patch series. ;)
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists