[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABQ03vG0FG5qs9EwjAeKoZv2k2Eez58v6oEjj4HoHY8wN8s34g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 13:41:20 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>,
stephen@...workplumber.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: skip fdb add if the port shouldn't learn
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:59 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 03:42:57 -0700
>
>> From: Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> Check in fdb_add_entry() if the source port should learn, similar
>> check is used in br_fdb_update.
>> Note that new fdb entries which are added manually or
>> as local ones are still permitted.
>> This patch has been tested by running traffic via a bridge port and
>> switching the port's state, also by manually adding/removing entries
>> from the bridge's fdb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> Nik: Maybe it'd be better if we returned an error even though it
>> doesn't look necessary. I'm open to suggestions.
>
> If you don't return an error, then rtnetlink.c is going to emit a
> NEWNEIGH netlink message. I seriously doubt we want that to happen.
Thanks Dave, I was afraid I've missed something like that. I'll re-spin, test
and post a v2.
Nik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists