netdev - Re: [PATCH] atm:he - Do not initialise statics to 0.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150525.163617.1172231502407784808.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2015 16:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	shailendra.capricorn@...il.com
Cc:	3chas3@...il.com, linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm:he - Do not initialise statics to 0.

From: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 01:23:53 +0530

> Static variables are initialised to 0 by GCC.
> Fixes the following checkpatch error:
> ERROR: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL
> FILE: drivers/atm/he.c:120:
> static bool sdh = 0;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>

true is not necessarily '1' and false is not necessarily '0',
therefore the correct fix would be to assign 'false' to this variable.

Furthermore you've submitted this in such a way that it cannot be
applied alongside the other atm:he patch you submitted.

This is why when you submit multiple patches to the same file, you
must group them and submit them relative to eachother and in a
specific order.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html