netdev - [net-next PATCH RFC 3/3] ip_vti/ip6_vti: Preserve skb->mark after rcv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150526224129.1328.69180.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2015 15:41:29 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
To:	steffen.klassert@...unet.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next PATCH RFC 3/3] ip_vti/ip6_vti: Preserve skb->mark after
 rcv_cb call

The vti6_rcv_cb and vti_rcv_cb calls were leaving the skb->mark modified
after completing the function.  This resulted in the original skb->mark
value being lost.  Since we only need skb->mark to be set for
xfrm_policy_check we can pull the assignment into the rcv_cb calls and then
just restore the original mark after xfrm_policy_check has been completed.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_vti.c  |    9 +++++++--
 net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c |    9 +++++++--
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
index 4c318e1c13c8..0c152087ca15 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ static int vti_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi,
 			goto drop;
 
 		XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4 = tunnel;
-		skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(tunnel->parms.i_key);
 
 		return xfrm_input(skb, nexthdr, spi, encap_type);
 	}
@@ -91,6 +90,8 @@ static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 	struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats;
 	struct xfrm_state *x;
 	struct ip_tunnel *tunnel = XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4;
+	u32 orig_mark = skb->mark;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!tunnel)
 		return 1;
@@ -107,7 +108,11 @@ static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 	x = xfrm_input_state(skb);
 	family = x->inner_mode->afinfo->family;
 
-	if (!xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family))
+	skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(tunnel->parms.i_key);
+	ret = xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family);
+	skb->mark = orig_mark;
+
+	if (!ret)
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	skb_scrub_packet(skb, !net_eq(tunnel->net, dev_net(skb->dev)));
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
index 104de4da3ff3..ff3bd863fa03 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
@@ -322,7 +322,6 @@ static int vti6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		}
 
 		XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip6 = t;
-		skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(t->parms.i_key);
 
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 
@@ -342,6 +341,8 @@ static int vti6_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 	struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats;
 	struct xfrm_state *x;
 	struct ip6_tnl *t = XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip6;
+	u32 orig_mark = skb->mark;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!t)
 		return 1;
@@ -358,7 +359,11 @@ static int vti6_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 	x = xfrm_input_state(skb);
 	family = x->inner_mode->afinfo->family;
 
-	if (!xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family))
+	skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(t->parms.i_key);
+	ret = xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family);
+	skb->mark = orig_mark;
+
+	if (!ret)
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	skb_scrub_packet(skb, !net_eq(t->net, dev_net(skb->dev)));

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html