[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150527.115602.371758291208515839.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:56:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fbl@...close.org
Cc: dev@...nvswitch.org, pshelar@...ira.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jbenc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net] openvswitch: disable LRO unless stated
otherwise
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...close.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:24:14 -0300
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:50:21AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 May 2015 15:03:56 -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> > OVS interface for generic networking device operation looks odd. have
>> > you considered adding new device ioctl to do this?
>>
>> New ioctls for networking configuration are generally not allowed. The
>> preferred way to configure networking is netlink. And as this is very
>> much ovs specific (all other users of dev_disable_lro such as bridging
>> want to do this unconditionally), ovs netlink is the correct place to
>> put this to.
>
> Exactly. Team, Bonding, bridge, and when you enable forwarding on a
> networking device gets LRO automatically disabled in the kernel.
>
> I suggest to always disable LRO in the kernel as the other examples
> do until there is a real need in OVS to benefit from LRO to implement
> such API change.
Agreed, just turn off LRO by default and don't add a new interface to
turn it back on until we actually need it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists