[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432693034.4060.336.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:17:14 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: tcp_tso_autosize() minimum is one packet
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 10:01 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:38:40AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > Not really. They're not identical. For example, before your
> > patch a packet greater than MSS with TSO disabled would call
> > tcp_nagle_test, with your patch it will call tcp_tso_should_defer
> > instead.
> >
> > Maybe this is OK but it is far from obvious.
>
> Funny enough it was you who originally introduced this change
> in behaviour:
>
> commit 8f26fb1c1ed81c33f5d87c5936f4d9d1b4118918
> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 15 12:24:54 2013 -0700
>
> tcp: remove the sk_can_gso() check from tcp_set_skb_tso_segs()
>
> Now you're trying to do it again :)
>
> The problem is back at the very beginning, tso_segs > 1 was the
> same as TSO enabled. So we either need to restore this identity
> or find a new way of indiciating that TSO is enabled.
>
> Cheers,
I have no idea of what you are trying to tell me.
I want to remove duplicate tests, not pushing new ones.
I do not want to add back sk_can_gso()
I do not find something funny here. Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists