lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 21:12:15 +0000
From:	"Guzman Mosqueda, Jose R" <jose.r.guzman.mosqueda@...el.com>
To:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shemminger@...l.org" <shemminger@...l.org>
Subject: Possible issue in iproute2 package


Hi all

I'm Jose Guzman from a security team at Intel.
We're using iproute2 in a GNU-Linux project and I'm analyzing the code
to try to find possible issues/gaps/risks.
Since I'm not too familiar with the package yet I have a question about
a particular piece of code that could result in a memory corruption:

Version: 4.0.0
File: misc/ss.c
Function: static void tcp_show_info(...)
Line: ~1903
Description: There is a memory allocation for a "s.cong_alg" variable:
s.cong_alg = malloc(strlen(cong_attr + 1));
The length is calculated about next position of the starting character.
But next line there is a copy of the whole content:
strcpy(s.cong_alg, cong_attr);
I think there is a mistake and it should be something like:
s.cong_alg = malloc(strlen(cong_attr) + 1);
Is this the case? Is it a real bug?
Also I don't see any checking for the value returned by the malloc call,
what if it returns a NULL pointer?

Also I found something similar about line 1903:
s.cong_alg = malloc(strlen(cong_attr + 1));
strcpy(s.cong_alg, cong_attr);

And another possible issue that I found:

File: tc/tc_util.c
Function: void print_rate(char *buf, int len, __u64 rate)
Line: ~264

In the case that user inputs a high value for rate, the "for" loop will
exit in the condition meaning that variable "i" get the value of 5 which
will be an invalid index for the "units" array due to that array has
only 5 elements.

I hope you can help me by checking these issues and tell me whether they
are real issues or not since you know much better the code.
Also I don't know if you have already this reported, I didn't find a
list of issues for this package. Can you tell me where is such list?

I really appreciate any help on this.

Thanks in advance.
Jose G.







Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ