[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432794354-19391-7-git-send-email-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:25:53 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] xfrm: move the checking for old xfrm_policy hold_queue to beginning
From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
if hold_queue of old xfrm_policy is NULL, return directly, then not need to
run other codes, especially take the spin lock
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 435bc0d..3d264e5 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ static void xfrm_policy_requeue(struct xfrm_policy *old,
struct xfrm_policy_queue *pq = &old->polq;
struct sk_buff_head list;
+ if (skb_queue_empty(&pq->hold_queue))
+ return;
+
__skb_queue_head_init(&list);
spin_lock_bh(&pq->hold_queue.lock);
@@ -708,9 +711,6 @@ static void xfrm_policy_requeue(struct xfrm_policy *old,
xfrm_pol_put(old);
spin_unlock_bh(&pq->hold_queue.lock);
- if (skb_queue_empty(&list))
- return;
-
pq = &new->polq;
spin_lock_bh(&pq->hold_queue.lock);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists