netdev - Re: [PATCH net iproute2 v2 1/2] mpls: always set type as RTN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5566DCB5.3000909@brocade.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 10:15:33 +0100
From:	Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
To:	roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC:	<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <vivek@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net iproute2 v2 1/2] mpls: always set type as RTN_UNICAST
 for route add/deletes

On 28/05/15 01:06, roopa wrote:
> On 5/27/15, 1:08 PM, roopa wrote:
>> On 5/27/15, 12:59 PM, Robert Shearman wrote:
>>> On 27/05/15 19:37, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>>>
>>>> Kernel expects type RTN_UNICAST for mpls route/dels
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkataraman <vivek@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   ip/iproute.c |    5 +++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c
>>>> index 670a4c6..71c088b 100644
>>>> --- a/ip/iproute.c
>>>> +++ b/ip/iproute.c
>>>> @@ -803,6 +803,7 @@ static int iproute_modify(int cmd, unsigned
>>>> flags, int argc, char **argv)
>>>>       int scope_ok = 0;
>>>>       int table_ok = 0;
>>>>       int raw = 0;
>>>> +    int type_ok = 0;
>>>>
>>>>       memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1095,6 +1096,7 @@ static int iproute_modify(int cmd, unsigned
>>>> flags, int argc, char **argv)
>>>>                   rtnl_rtntype_a2n(&type, *argv) == 0) {
>>>>                   NEXT_ARG();
>>>>                   req.r.rtm_type = type;
>>>> +                type_ok = 1;
>>>>               }
>>>>
>>>>               if (matches(*argv, "help") == 0)
>>>> @@ -1160,6 +1162,9 @@ static int iproute_modify(int cmd, unsigned
>>>> flags, int argc, char **argv)
>>>>           }
>>>>       }
>>>>
>>>> +    if (!type_ok && req.r.rtm_family == AF_MPLS)
>>>> +        req.r.rtm_type = RTN_UNICAST;
>>>> +
>>>>       if (req.r.rtm_family == AF_UNSPEC)
>>>>           req.r.rtm_family = AF_INET;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is this block of code near the start of iproute_modify that
>>> sets req.r.rtm_type in the add/modify cases:
>>>
>>>         if (cmd != RTM_DELROUTE) {
>>>                 req.r.rtm_protocol = RTPROT_BOOT;
>>>                 req.r.rtm_scope = RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE;
>>>                 req.r.rtm_type = RTN_UNICAST;
>>>         }
>>>
>>> How about doing similar for the mpls delete case? This would avoid
>>> the need to track if the type has been set and would also make the
>>> way rtm_type is set in the delete case as close as possible to that
>>> in the add/modify cases.
>> sure that works too. There was already *_ok checks for the rest of the
>> attributes, ..so added it there.
>>
>> v3 ...coming...
>>
> looking at the code again..now i remember why i have it this way. I will
> have to add a check for family around
> the code you point out above. And it some cases if the user has not
> specified the family explicitly, we derive the msg family
> in the while loop that parses the args...based on the other arguments
> given by the user.
> In the particular mpls case though, user explicitly specifies the family
> and moving the patch to the code you point above should be ok.
>
> But to be consistent with the rest of the code, it seems better to do
> the check and set the defaults at the end after parsing all the args.
>
> So, now i am inclined to keep the v2 patch as is...unless you have
> strong reasons.

Ah, yes, of course.

In that case, LGTM.

Thanks,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html