Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 08:17:27 -0300
From:	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
	Michio Honda <micchie@....wide.ad.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix ASCONF list handling

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 06:15:11AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:52:17PM -0300, mleitner@...hat.com wrote:
> > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> > 
> > ->auto_asconf_splist is per namespace and mangled by functions like
> > sctp_setsockopt_auto_asconf() which doesn't guarantee any serialization.
> > 
> > Also, the call to inet_sk_copy_descendant() was backuping
> > ->auto_asconf_list through the copy but was not honoring
> > ->do_auto_asconf, which could lead to list corruption if it was
> > different between both sockets.
> > 
> > This commit thus fixes the list handling by adding a spinlock to protect
> > against multiple writers and converts the list to be protected by RCU
> > too, so that we don't have a lock inverstion issue at
> > sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler().
> > 
> > And as this list now uses RCU, we cannot do such backup and restore
> > while copying descendant data anymore as readers may be traversing the
> > list meanwhile. We fix this by simply ignoring/not copying those fields,
> > placed at the end of struct sctp_sock, so we can just ignore it together
> > with struct ipv6_pinfo data. For that we create sctp_copy_descendant()
> > so we don't clutter inet_sk_copy_descendant() with SCTP info.
> > 
> > Issue was found with a test application that kept flipping sysctl
> > default_auto_asconf on and off.
> > 
> > Fixes: 9f7d653b67ae ("sctp: Add Auto-ASCONF support (core).")
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  include/net/netns/sctp.h   |  6 +++++-
> >  include/net/sctp/structs.h |  2 ++
> >  net/sctp/protocol.c        |  6 +++++-
> >  net/sctp/socket.c          | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/net/netns/sctp.h b/include/net/netns/sctp.h
> > index 3573a81815ad9e0efb6ceb721eb066d3726419f0..e080bebb3147af39c8275261f57018eb01e917b0 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netns/sctp.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netns/sctp.h
> > @@ -30,12 +30,15 @@ struct netns_sctp {
> >  	struct list_head local_addr_list;
> >  	struct list_head addr_waitq;
> >  	struct timer_list addr_wq_timer;
> > -	struct list_head auto_asconf_splist;
> > +	struct list_head __rcu auto_asconf_splist;
> You should use the addr_wq_lock here instead of creating a new lock, as thats
> already used to protect most accesses to the list you are concerned about.

Ok, that works too.

> Though truthfully, that shouldn't be necessecary.  The list in question is only
> read in one location and only written in one location.  You can likely just
> rcu-ify, as the write side is in process context and protected by lock_sock.

It should, it's not protected by lock_sock as this list resides in
netns_sctp structure, which lock_sock doesn't cover. Write side is in
process context yes, but this list is written in sctp_init_sock(),
sctp_destroy_sock() and sctp_setsockopt_auto_asconf(), so one could
trigger this by either creating/destroying sockets if
default_auto_asconf=1 or just by creating a bunch of sockets and
flipping asconf via setsockopt (or a combination of these operations).
(I'll point this out in the changelog)

Btw I have two nits on the patch kindly broght to my attention already,
on adding blank newline and bad comment block, will fix it in v2.

  Marcelo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists